On September 27, 2012, the Swedish government portal published an article by Sweden’s Foreign Minister Carl Bildt’s vision of a reunited Europe. Excerpts below:
My vision is clear. I want Europe to be a continent without dividing lines, where people, ideas, trade and investment can move freely, across increasingly irrelevant borders. This would make Europe and its people more prosperous, innovative and secure.
The Eastern Partnership (EaP) was launched in Prague in May 2009 after an initial proposal by Sweden and Poland. The idea – and promise – was to start a process of ever closer relations between the European Union and our Eastern European neighbours: Azerbaijan, Armenia, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and Belarus.
Over the years, this vision has been repeatedly challenged. Inside the EU, there is strong backing for the EaP, but we sometimes differ in our level of ambition. In the partner countries, public support for coming closer to the EU is strong, but vested interests often block or slow down necessary reforms. We also face a growing outside pressure directed against closer cooperation between the EU and the countries of Eastern Europe. The Russian Federation currently seems intent to use all instruments at its disposal in a brutal attempt to sway our partners from their European path. Over the summer Ukraine and Moldova have been targeted. And recently Armenia – after having successfully negotiated an Association Agreement and a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area with the EU for over three years – suddenly announced its intention to join the Customs Union of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. This campaign is based on a zero-sum logic, quite alien to the win-win approach of both the EU and the Eastern Partnership. Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas are fully compatible with Free Trade Agreements with other countries, and the EU welcomes the development of better trade relations among CIS countries; membership of a Customs Union, however, is a different matter.
In the EU, we will continue to be very clear that it is the sovereign right of every country to choose its own path and that undue pressure is unacceptable.
The third summit of the Eastern Partnership will take place in Vilnius on November 28th and 29th this year. As we approach the summit, we can and should look forward to an opportunity to celebrate all the progress made and the start of a new era in the EU’s relations with Eastern Europe.
On many fronts and despite the challenges, the Partnership has delivered more than we could have credibly expected during its first few years of existence. By theVilnius summit we expect to have finalised negotiations on Association Agreements, including Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas, with Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, with negotiations still ongoing with Azerbaijan. In principle the Agreement with Armenia could also be finalised, but there we now have serious doubts.
(Comment: When this article was published in September of 2013, the prospects for the Vilnius meeting on November 28-29, 2013, was fairly good but now, ten days before the meeting there is less optimism. The treaty with Ukraine is still possible but there are presently only a little more than a week for Ukraine to decide on the fate of imprisoned Yulia Tymeshenko.)
At the same time, it is clear that much remains to be achieved. We are only at the beginning of this journey. For the promises of the Eastern Partnership to fully materialise, both the EU and the partner countries must leave our respective comfort zones. The EU must be ready to more fully embrace these European states and their citizens, and enhance our political, practical and financial support along the way. At the same time, the partner countries must realise that the EU is not only aclub for trade and big politics. It is a civilisational choice – in favour of competitive politics and fully democratic elections, the rule of law, the protection of minorities and a vibrant, and sometimes cheeky, civil society. This is to mention just a few of the fundamental building blocks of the European model.
…I have been deeply concerned during the past few years about signs of democratic backsliding in Ukraine, where electoral shortcomings,
instances of selective justice and a lack of reforms have led to a slowdown in the EU integration process. Our aim for the summit is to see a clear reversal of this trend so as to be able to sign the Association Agreement, which would make Ukraine the first partner to complete that step.
Georgia and Moldova share a very high level of ambition in their relations with the EU. Georgia has also enacted impressive reforms in recent years, not least in its successful fight against pervasive corruption. However, the country must now further improve its democratic credentials by managing the transfer of political power without infringing on the rights of the new opposition. Moldova is very serious about its EU approximation and reforms, and has made more progress than any other partner towards a future visa-free travel regime with the EU. At the same time, the political crisis this spring showed that Moldova still needs to work hard to depoliticise important state institutions.
As for Armenia, relations with the EU have been noticeably upgraded since the launch of the EaP, but the recent U-turn in favour of Eurasian integration leaves us with a number of questions. Azerbaijan has made it clear that its main interest in the cooperation with the EU is areas such as energy and economic modernisation. In this country, an impressive economic boom has not yet been accompanied by more civil liberty, and the upcoming elections in October this year will be closely watched.
In Belarus, the longstanding EU demand for a release of all political prisoners has not been addressed, and there are few signs of any meaningful reforms. As a result, the EU has adopted sanctions and a policy of critical engagement, and the EU’s bilateral cooperation with Belarus is limited.
Across the region, there is an urgent need to get serious about corruption and vested interests. And of course, solving the protracted conflicts affecting Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and Moldova is essential for the stability and future prosperity of the region. Here, the EU must be even clearer in its interaction with all the parties to the conflicts regarding the need to seriously and in good faith step up efforts towards confidence building and conflict resolution.
For Sweden – and for the EU – there are no alternatives to continued whole-hearted engagement with our Eastern European neighbours. Sharing the same continent, our destinies are intertwined. How we go about it is a matter of our choices. In the coming years, much of the focus should be on the implementation of mutual commitments in areas such as trade, mobility and further democratisation and protection of human rights. At the same time, we should start considering the next steps towards a reunited Europe, which could include an “EaP economic area”. In any case, the EU has an obligation to remain ambitious in our approach towards the Eastern Partnership, as long as that ambition is matched by even a single partner. This idea, often referred to as the principle of “more for more”, implies that the more progress a partner country makes, the more the EU will offer that country
in return, in the form of closer relations and enhanced financial support.
It is my deep conviction that we have everything to gain from ever deeper relations in Europe and that, in a longer perspective perhaps, the door to the EU must remain open to any European country that wishes to join and that fulfils all the criteria.