Washington Times on April 4, 2014, published a review by Robert W. Merry on a new book by geopolitician Robert D. Kaplan. He first gained national recognition nearly 25 years ago with publication of his third book, “Balkan Ghosts,” part history and part travelogue, which explored the social, political and cultural complexities of the Balkans, just as that region was about to descend into Europe’s worst spree of violence since World War II. Excerpts below:

It was said that Mr. Kaplan was so compelling in his description of the hopeless hatreds of the old Yugoslavia that President Clinton, upon reading the book, resolved to stay out of the region.

Mr. Clinton eventually embraced that narrative, as attested by his 78-day bombing campaign against Serbia aimed at ripping the Serbs’ ancestral lands in Kosovo, now majority Albanian Muslim, out of the hands of Serbia.

Now, 12 books later, Mr. Kaplan is out with “Asia’s Cauldron: The South China Sea and the End of a Stable Pacific.(Random, 2014).” Like “Balkan Ghosts,” the latest book is the product of considerable historical analysis tied to journalistic observations emanating from extensive travels through the region.

It is a region, writes Mr. Kaplan, that will assume huge import in coming decades in geopolitical and demographic terms. It will also spawn some of the world’s most intense geopolitical maneuvering.

To understand the significance of the South China Sea, we must elevate ourselves and look at a bigger map of the surrounding maritime territory. By 2050, Mr. Kaplan tells us, nearly 7 billion of the world’s 9 billion people will live generally in East Asia, Southeast Asia, South Asia, the Middle East, and East Africa. This constitutes a “global demographic heartland,” with its central organizing principle being the Greater Indian Ocean, along with the Western Pacific.

This map unites by sea what the noted British geopolitical scholar Halford Mckinder called the globe’s “Eurasian Heartland,” the world’s most significant strategic territory. Mr. Kaplan sees this greater region as stretching from the Horn of Africa across the Indian Ocean, bending around Indonesia, then up to the Sea of Japan.

The outer points in this map are South Asia, Japan and Australia. But, says Mr. Kaplan, “the countries of the South China Sea constitute the inner points, or strategic core of it. The South China Sea is the Mitteleuropa of the twenty-first century.”

This has an ominous ring to it. It suggests that Europe and Western Civilization, after half a millennium of global dominance, will no longer enjoy that status.

“The South China Sea,” writes Mr. Kaplan, “whether in peace or in war, allows one to imagine the world as it is, and as it is to become. It is a nervous world, crowded with warships and oil tankers, one of incessant war games without necessarily leading to actual combat: a world in which actions taken by a country such as Vietnam … can affect the highest decisions of state in Beijing and Washington.”

China could force the United States out of the region. (Comment: It should be noted that the United States, however, with allies is preparing to stop China and these nations have a geopolitical and geostrategic advantage in the Indian Ocean and in the Pacific Ocean.)

“But the era of simple American dominance, as it existed through all of the Cold War decades and immediately beyond will likely have to pass,” concludes Mr. Kaplan, “A more anxious, complicated world awaits us.” (Comment: It will be a long conflict but the dominance of the United States and its allies, especially Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, will remain. However, diligent preparations are needed.)

[The geopolitical] challenge, involving raw power and relentless geopolitical forces, will require an imaginative, forceful and sophisticated approach, unencumbered by extraneous or frivolous distractions that have little bearing on vital U.S. strategic interests.

Robert W. Merry, political editor of The National Interest, is the author most recently of “Where They Stand: The American Presidents in the Eyes of Voters and Historians” (Simon & Schuster, 2012).


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: