Posts Tagged ‘drone warfare’


May 24, 2013

Fox News on May 23, 2013, published an article by K.T. McFarland on President Obama delivering what was billed by the White House as a “major” speech on national security at the historic National Defense University. In short, Mr. Obama thinks the War on Terror is over, and he won it. There may be a few final details to mop about, but it’s time to move on to more important things. Excerpts below:

The speech was typical of Mr. Obama: Open with a broad sweep of history from the beginning of the republic to today.

Follow that with a laundry list of all the great things he has done to reverse the bad things his predecessor did.

Brush failures under the rug, blame them on others, or marks them as the inevitable course of history.

Maybe Thursday’s speech wasn’t so much about foreign policy as domestic politics.

Then finish with uplifting rhetoric, adding in a dash about the greatness of America.

The only new thing the president did discuss was his drone policy and targeted killings. Even then, he didn’t clarify much.

On the one hand, the president said drone strikes have killed “dozens of skilled Al Qaeda” fighters and taken them off the battlefield. Mr. Obama claims drone strikes are legal, effective and save American lives since we don’t have to put our boots on the ground. From that you’d assume drone killings are here to stay — we kill bad guys at no risk to ourselves.

But on the other hand the president wants to limit their use –and turn to them only if there is no chance of capturing the terrorists, and only if no civilians will be hurt. Under those circumstances it’s hard to see us ever using drone strikes again.

Frankly, it’s a muddle.

If the drone strikes have been as effective as Mr. Obama claims, why are there more terrorists in more places than before as has Al Qaeda and its affiliates have set up shop in new countries? And if Al Qaeda has spread, why limit the drone strikes?

As for the rest of the speech, there was nothing new.

So why did Mr. Obama give this speech? And why did the White House bill it as a major foreign policy address, the first one of his second term?

Why give a speech that focused on smaller issues like drone strikes and Gitmo, but avoided completely the bigger issues of nuclear proliferation, Iran and the Middle East?

Maybe the speech on May 23 wasn’t so much about foreign policy as domestic politics. Maybe it was an attempt to divert attention away from the scandals of Benghazi, the IRS, the targeting of the AP and now Fox News that have dominated the headlines and threaten to derail Mr. Obama’s second term agenda.

It wasn’t much of a success as a foreign policy speech. But it was a complete failure as a political diversion.

Kathleen Troia “K.T.” McFarland is a Fox News National Security Analyst and host of’s “DefCon 3.” She is a Distinguished Adviser to the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies and served in national security posts in the Nixon, Ford and Reagan administrations. She wrote Secretary of Defense Weinberger’s November 1984 “Principles of War Speech” which laid out the Weinberger Doctrine.